GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon RX Vega M GL you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX Vega M GL will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 71% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 505 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
60−65
220−230
medium / 768p
27−30
190−200
ultra / 1080p
7−8
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
16−18
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon RX Vega M GL have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
low / 768p
18−20
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
0−1
60−65
medium / 768p
−
40−45
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
GT2xx
GCN 4.0
Code name
N11E-GS1
Polaris 22
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
7 January 2010
1 February 2018
Pipelines
96
1280
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
1011 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
80.88
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.1
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price