GeForce GTS 360M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 360M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 526% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 862 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 489% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTS 360M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 377% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GT2xx | Fermi |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 96 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 727 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |