GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 450 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 450 stacks up against Radeon Pro WX 3200, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
106 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 450 has 63% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTS 450 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 450.
GeForce GTS 450 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 450 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 450 is 484 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTS 450 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 4196 MHz higher, than GeForce GTS 450.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 450 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
190−200
medium / 768p
95−100
160−170
ultra / 1080p
45−50
85−90
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
85−90
ultra / 1080p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
4−5
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
55−60
90−95
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 105% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
21−24
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
50−55
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
4−5
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
65−70
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
medium / 768p
12−14
27−30
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
Fermi
Polaris
Code name
GF106
Polaris 12
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
13 September 2010
26 September 2019
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
1566 MHz
1082 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
25.1 billion/sec
41.44
Floating-point performance
601.3 gflops
Length
8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.7 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
