GeForce GTS 450 vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 450 and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 450 stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
106 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 133% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 450.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 450.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 450 is build with Fermi architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 450 is 992 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GeForce GTS 450 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 240 mm longer, than GeForce GTS 450.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1328 MHz higher, than GeForce GTS 450.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
8−9
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 218% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
30−35
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−33
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
16−18
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 152% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 227% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
9−10
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 171% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTS 450.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 450
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GF106
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
13 September 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
192
448
Core clock speed
1566 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
25.1 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
601.3 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.7 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
192
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
40 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
