GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Tesla C2070
When comparing GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is 792 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1236 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Fortnite is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | April 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1366 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 84 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Quadro M5000M
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Tesla C2070 vs Quadro M5000M
- Tesla C2070 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost