GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is 792 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1380 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | − |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Fortnite is 128% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Minecraft is 32% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 185% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | April 2018 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1366 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 84 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Quadro M5000M
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Quadro M5000M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X