FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 366% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 99 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tahiti | N17P-G0 Max-Q |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 3 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 999 - 1189 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1139 - 1328 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 53.12 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,700 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |