GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 295
When comparing GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and GeForce GTX 295, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q and GeForce GTX 295 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 243 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q is 6001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Dota 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N17P-G0 Max-Q | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2018 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 640 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 999 - 1189 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1139 - 1328 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 53.12 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,700 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 880M
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 660
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275