GeForce GTX 1050 mobile vs GRID K140Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and GRID K140Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and GRID K140Q.
GRID K140Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile | GRID K140Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is 504 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is 5226 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 1150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 200% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Dota 2 is 179% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1025% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Fortnite is 390% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 757% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 210% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 131% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 4100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2650% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile | GRID K140Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107B | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 59.72 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDCP | 2.2 | |
Laptop size | large | |
GameStream | + | |
GPU Boost | 3.0 | |
Check Price |