GeForce GTX 1050 mobile vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1050 mobile will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1050 mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile is 4008 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 1050 mobile and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Fortnite is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 mobile in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1050 mobile | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP107B | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1493 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 59.72 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDCP | 2.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | |
| Check Price |