FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 366% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q - with Pascal.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is 2200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 58% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N17P-G1 Max-Q |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 3 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 68.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,177 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| G-SYNC support | + | |
| VR Ready | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 270
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 970M
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 680
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 970M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 680