GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 280
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and GeForce GTX 280, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q stacks up against GeForce GTX 280, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 236 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 has 214% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 280 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 280.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 280 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and GeForce GTX 280 - with Tesla 2.0.
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 280 - by 65 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is 5893 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 443% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 766% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 280. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 280 | |
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N17P-G1 Max-Q | GT200 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2018 | 16 June 2008 |
Pipelines | 768 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 | 48.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
VR Ready | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 6.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 970M
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 680
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 970M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs GeForce GTX 680
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M