GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q vs Tesla C2075
When comparing GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q is 3868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
16−18
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−11
QHD / 1440p
16−18
4−5
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
35−40
medium / 1080p
40−45
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
55−60
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
35−40
6−7
4K / 2160p
18−20
6−7
low / 720p
100−110
55−60
medium / 1080p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
210−220
medium / 768p
220−230
190−200
ultra / 1080p
180−190
100−110
QHD / 1440p
110−120
65−70
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−35
high / 768p
210−220
150−160
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
100−110
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
40−45
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
14−16
6−7
low / 720p
80−85
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
27−30
14−16
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
60−65
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
21−24
QHD / 1440p
30−35
10−11
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
65−70
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 103% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
140−150
90−95
medium / 768p
120−130
80−85
high / 1080p
70−75
30−35
ultra / 1080p
30−35
14−16
QHD / 1440p
21−24
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
20−22
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
1−2
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
30−35
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
4K / 2160p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2075.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Code name
N17P-G1 Max-Q
GF110
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2018
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,300 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
16 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
68.02
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,177 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
7000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
VR Ready
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
6.1
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price
