GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs Quadro M3000M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Quadro M3000M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Quadro M3000M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | Quadro M3000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is build with Pascal architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 456 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
- GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Quadro M3000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is 3008 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | Quadro M3000M | |
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP106 | GM204 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 26 December 2017 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1,024 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1709 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 136.7 | 67.20 |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 5.2 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |