FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
When comparing FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 1066% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 70 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 3200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 59% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 58% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S7000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Pitcairn | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 270
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 280X
- FirePro S7000 vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100