FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 270 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 4400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
| Code name | RV770 | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 23 April 2019 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |