FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 195 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 3400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
Code name | Cypress | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 280X
- FireStream 9370 vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100