GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 433% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 241 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 3992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 223% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | Turing | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | GF114 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 779 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | 2.1 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M