GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GRID K140Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GRID K140Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GRID K140Q.
GRID K140Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GRID K140Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 333% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 170 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 6218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 581% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GRID K140Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |