GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 275 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |