GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon HD 4850 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4850 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 733% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 395 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 6010 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 363% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 625 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,000.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs Radeon R9 280X
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce 840A
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 295
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce 840A
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295