GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R7 M270
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q or Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Radeon R7 M270
Power consumption (TDP)
30 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5, GDDR6
Not Listed
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 195 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
0−1
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
1−2
medium / 1080p
40−45
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
0−1
medium / 1080p
60−65
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
60−65
medium / 768p
220−230
27−30
ultra / 1080p
180−190
7−8
QHD / 1440p
110−120
−
4K / 2160p
70−75
−
high / 768p
210−220
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and Radeon R7 M270 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
110−120
10−11
ultra / 1080p
100−110
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
45−50
−
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
−
low / 720p
80−85
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
21−24
medium / 1080p
110−120
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
60−65
0−1
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
0−1
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
0−1
medium / 1080p
65−70
0−1
low / 768p
140−150
18−20
medium / 768p
120−130
−
high / 1080p
70−75
0−1
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
20−22
−
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
30−35
−
low / 768p
130−140
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
100−110
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
low / 768p
130−140
0−1
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
45−50
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
50−55
0−1
high / 768p
60−65
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R7 M270.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Radeon R7 M270
Architecture
Turing
GCN
Code name
N18P-G0 / N18P-G61
Opal XT / Mars
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
23 April 2019
7 January 2014
Pipelines
1024
384
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
825 MHz
Boost Clock
1245 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
19.80
Floating-point performance
633.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Not Listed
Vulkan
1.2.140
CUDA
7.5
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
DualGraphics
+
ZeroCore
+
Switchable graphics
+
Mantle
+
Check Price
Check Price