FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 645 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 4400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
Code name | RV770 | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 99.84 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro W8100
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q