GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
When comparing GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 9800 GTX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5, GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 180% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 9800 GTX has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile - in Laptops.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800 GTX is 293 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce 9800 GTX is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 6900 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 9800 GTX and GeForce GTX 1650 mobile have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 9800 GTX. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800 GTX | GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | |
Architecture | Tesla | Turing |
Code name | G92 | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 28 March 2008 | 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 128 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 754 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion/sec | 99.84 |
Floating-point performance | 432.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | + | 7.5 |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | Via Adapter | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon HD 4810
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon HD 4810
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon R8 M365DX
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce 9800 GTX vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q