GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GRID K140Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K140Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 mobile will be the best choice, for others GRID K140Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K140Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K140Q has 160% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 545 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K140Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 6218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 940% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 1675% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 245% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K140Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 194% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1525% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 581% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 1128% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 291% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 187% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 97% more, than GRID K140Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K140Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |