GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GRID K220Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K220Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K220Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K220Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 650 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K220Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 2 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |