GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 650 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 April 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |