GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
When choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 500% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 395 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 6000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 26 August 2018 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 336.0 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs FirePro W8100
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Quadro M620
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 465
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Quadro M620
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 465