GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon R7 M270DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R7 M270DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 mobile stacks up against Radeon R7 M270DX, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 495 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 422% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 940 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 22.56 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs FirePro W8100
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon E6760
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515