GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon R9 270X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 mobile will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
180 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5, GDDR6
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 270X has 260% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 270X.
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 270X - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
24−27
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−11
4K / 2160p
10−11
6−7
low / 720p
60−65
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p
55−60
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
35−40
18−20
4K / 2160p
18−20
10−12
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
60−65
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
240−250
medium / 768p
220−230
210−220
ultra / 1080p
180−190
140−150
QHD / 1440p
110−120
110−120
4K / 2160p
70−75
60−65
high / 768p
210−220
180−190
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and Radeon R9 270X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 4% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p
45−50
30−35
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
QHD / 1440p
27−30
21−24
4K / 2160p
14−16
10−11
low / 720p
80−85
60−65
medium / 1080p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
27−30
18−20
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
140−150
medium / 1080p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 33% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p
60−65
40−45
ultra / 1080p
45−50
30−35
QHD / 1440p
30−35
18−20
4K / 2160p
24−27
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
65−70
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p
140−150
110−120
medium / 768p
120−130
100−110
high / 1080p
70−75
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
21−24
QHD / 1440p
21−24
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
20−22
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
4−5
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p
130−140
120−130
medium / 1080p
120−130
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
3−4
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p
130−140
90−95
medium / 768p
85−90
55−60
high / 1080p
45−50
30−35
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
4K / 2160p
16−18
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
45−50
high / 768p
60−65
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 270X.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
Radeon R9 270X
Architecture
Turing
GCN
Code name
N18P-G0, N18P-G61
Curacao XT
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
23 April 2019
8 October 2013
Pipelines
1024
1280
Core clock speed
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
99.84
84.00
Floating-point performance
2,688 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.140
+
CUDA
7.5
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
318 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
TrueAudio
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
163 Sol/s
AppAcceleration
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Check Price
Check Price
