GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 Nano
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 Nano will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Radeon R9 Nano
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
175 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR6
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 Nano has 75% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 Nano - with GCN 1.2.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 Nano - by 28 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 77 mm longer, than Radeon R9 Nano.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 11500 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 Nano.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
50−55
50−55
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
QHD / 1440p
27−30
27−30
4K / 2160p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
75−80
80−85
medium / 1080p
60−65
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p
80−85
80−85
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
QHD / 1440p
55−60
55−60
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
low / 720p
130−140
130−140
medium / 1080p
90−95
90−95
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
250−260
250−260
medium / 768p
230−240
230−240
QHD / 1440p
150−160
150−160
4K / 2160p
100−110
100−110
high / 768p
220−230
220−230
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
65−70
65−70
ultra / 1080p
60−65
60−65
QHD / 1440p
40−45
40−45
4K / 2160p
21−24
21−24
low / 720p
100−110
100−110
medium / 1080p
65−70
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Far Cry 5 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
70−75
75−80
QHD / 1440p
45−50
45−50
4K / 2160p
21−24
21−24
low / 720p
220−230
220−230
medium / 1080p
140−150
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p
85−90
85−90
ultra / 1080p
65−70
70−75
QHD / 1440p
50−55
50−55
4K / 2160p
30−35
35−40
low / 720p
130−140
140−150
medium / 1080p
90−95
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p
160−170
160−170
medium / 768p
150−160
150−160
high / 1080p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
30−35
30−35
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
4K / 2160p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
95−100
95−100
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in Metro Exodus is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
75−80
80−85
ultra / 1080p
55−60
55−60
4K / 2160p
18−20
18−20
low / 720p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
85−90
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
high / 1080p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
24−27
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
4K / 2160p
10−12
12−14
low / 720p
95−100
95−100
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 Nano have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
190−200
190−200
medium / 768p
120−130
130−140
high / 1080p
70−75
75−80
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
4K / 2160p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
ultra / 1080p
65−70
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 Nano in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Radeon R9 Nano
Architecture
Turing
GCN 1.2
Code name
TU116
Fiji
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
22 November 2019
10 September 2015
Pipelines
1280
4096
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1000 MHz
Transistor count
6,600 million
8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
138.0
256.0
Floating-point performance
8,192 gflops
Length
229 mm
152 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
4096 Bit
Memory clock speed
12000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
512 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
VR Ready
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.5
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
CUDA
7.5
G-SYNC
+
Multi Monitor
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
PowerTune
+
TrueAudio
+
ZeroCore
+
Mantle
+
Design
reference
Bridgeless CrossFire
+
Number of Eyefinity displays
6
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
VCE
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
295 Sol/s
Compute units
64
AppAcceleration
+
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
FRTC
+
Check Price
Check Price