FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 285 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 6400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
Code name | RV770 | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 2 April 2020 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 76.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce 930MX
- FireStream 9270 vs FirePro V5900
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce 930MX
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs FirePro V5900
- FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960