GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 260 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | GF117 | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 April 2020 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 76.80 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 7.5 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce 820A vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 7730M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro 500M
- GeForce 820A vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960