GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
32 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3\GDDR5
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 56% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
GeForce GT 645M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
2−3
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
3−4
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
12−14
100−110
medium / 1080p
4−5
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
85−90
220−230
ultra / 1080p
35−40
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
10−11
70−75
high / 768p
60−65
210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
18−20
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
10−11
80−85
medium / 1080p
3−4
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
45−50
180−190
medium / 1080p
8−9
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
3−4
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
14−16
100−110
medium / 1080p
6−7
65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
3−4
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
1−2
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
3−4
65−70
medium / 1080p
2−3
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
4−5
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
8−9
130−140
medium / 768p
7−8
85−90
high / 1080p
3−4
45−50
ultra / 1080p
3−4
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
high / 768p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GeForce GT 645M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Code name
N13P-GS
N18P-G62 Max-Q
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
2 April 2020
Pipelines
384
1024
Core clock speed
1035 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
22.7 billion/sec
76.80
Floating-point performance
544.5 gflops
Memory bus width
128bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.140
CUDA
+
7.5
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
3D Blu-Ray
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
19 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price