GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GRID K220Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K220Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K220Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GRID K220Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 290 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K220Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 5000 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GRID K220Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 2 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GRID K220Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GRID K220Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce 920A
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 M365X
- GRID K220Q vs GeForce 920A
- GRID K220Q vs Radeon R7 M365X