GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q or Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR6
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 233% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 735 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
4−5
ultra / 1080p
21−24
3−4
QHD / 1440p
16−18
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
12−14
medium / 1080p
40−45
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
55−60
−
ultra / 1080p
45−50
7−8
QHD / 1440p
35−40
0−1
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
low / 720p
100−110
16−18
medium / 1080p
60−65
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
250−260
110−120
medium / 768p
220−230
85−90
ultra / 1080p
180−190
40−45
QHD / 1440p
110−120
24−27
4K / 2160p
70−75
−
high / 768p
210−220
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
110−120
45−50
ultra / 1080p
100−110
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
45−50
6−7
ultra / 1080p
40−45
5−6
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
3−4
low / 720p
80−85
12−14
medium / 1080p
45−50
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
60−65
12−14
ultra / 1080p
45−50
8−9
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
50−55
medium / 1080p
110−120
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
60−65
9−10
ultra / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
30−35
0−1
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
18−20
medium / 1080p
65−70
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
140−150
40−45
medium / 768p
120−130
35−40
high / 1080p
70−75
8−9
ultra / 1080p
30−35
5−6
QHD / 1440p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
3−4
ultra / 1080p
20−22
2−3
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
0−1
low / 720p
65−70
8−9
medium / 1080p
30−35
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
130−140
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
120−130
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
8−9
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
130−140
16−18
medium / 768p
85−90
12−14
high / 1080p
45−50
7−8
ultra / 1080p
24−27
5−6
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
50−55
14−16
high / 768p
60−65
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Turing
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
N18P-G62 Max-Q
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 April 2020
2 June 2015
Pipelines
1024
48
Core clock speed
1035 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
4,700 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
12 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
76.80
40.80
Floating-point performance
883.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.5
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.140
1.1.80
CUDA
7.5
Laptop size
medium sized
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
