GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro K2200M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2200M
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 368 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Quadro K2200M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 4988 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 82% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Quadro K2200M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K2200M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 667 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs FirePro S9050
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GRID M60 8Q
- Quadro K2200M vs FirePro S9050
- Quadro K2200M vs GRID M60 8Q