GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q stacks up against Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 500% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 12 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 35 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 8000 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 26 August 2018 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 336.0 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro M620
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 465
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Quadro M620
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 465