GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 315 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 240% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 4890
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX