GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R7 M465X
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M465X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R7 M465X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 M465X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 135 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M465X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 5500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 115% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 229% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M465X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R7 M465X | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Tropo |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 29.60 |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R7 M465X vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs FirePro W5130M
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M360
- Radeon R7 M465X vs FirePro W5130M
- Radeon R7 M465X vs Radeon R9 M360