GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 370
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 120% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 110 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 4400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | Trinidad |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon R9 370 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 7950
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
- Radeon R9 370 vs Radeon HD 7950
- Radeon R9 370 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI