GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Tesla C2050
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 376% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 461 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 7000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | N/A |
CUDA | 7.5 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M