Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Tesla C2075

    When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2075, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and Tesla C2075 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q Check Price
    Tesla C2075 Check Price

    GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:

    GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q Tesla C2075
    Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 247 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
    Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI
      Check Price Check Price
    • Tesla C2075 has 394% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
    • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
    • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2075 - in Desktops.
    • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
    • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 461 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
    • GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 6868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 35−40 16−18
    ultra / 1080p 21−24 10−11
    QHD / 1440p 16−18 4−5
    4K / 2160p 10−11 −
    low / 720p 60−65 35−40
    medium / 1080p 40−45 21−24
    The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.

    Full Specs

      GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q Tesla C2075
    Architecture Turing Fermi 2.0
    Code name N18P-G62 Max-Q GF110
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 2 April 2020 25 July 2011
    Pipelines 1024 448
    Core clock speed 1035 MHz 574 MHz
    Boost Clock 1200 MHz
    Transistor count 4,700 million 3,000 million
    Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 76.80 32.14
    Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops
    Length 248 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
    Memory clock speed 10000 MHz 3132 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 150.3 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.5 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.1
    Vulkan 1.2.140 N/A
    CUDA 7.5 2.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 94 Mh/s
    Laptop size medium sized
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares