FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
When comparing FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 930 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 363% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 254% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 360% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 196% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 378% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | TU117 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | no data |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |