FirePro W4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

In this comparison between FirePro W4100 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4100 Check Price

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Main Specs

	FirePro W4100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 900 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 58 mm longer, than FirePro W4100.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	20−22
4K / 2160p	−	10−12
low / 720p	16−18	65−70
medium / 1080p	8−9	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 388% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	12−14	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	20−22
low / 720p	24−27	110−120
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 393% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	130−140	250−260
medium / 768p	110−120	220−230
ultra / 1080p	50−55	190−200
QHD / 1440p	30−33	120−130
4K / 2160p	27−30	75−80
high / 768p	80−85	210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 94% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	8−9	50−55
ultra / 1080p	8−9	45−50
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	18−20	85−90
medium / 1080p	9−10	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	14−16	65−70
ultra / 1080p	10−11	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	60−65	190−200
medium / 1080p	21−24	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 307% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	12−14	65−70
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
QHD / 1440p	1−2	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	24−27	110−120
medium / 1080p	14−16	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 430% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	50−55	140−150
medium / 768p	45−50	130−140
high / 1080p	12−14	75−80
ultra / 1080p	6−7	35−40
QHD / 1440p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	75−80
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	95−100	130−140
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	7−8	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−12	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 340% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	24−27	140−150
medium / 768p	16−18	90−95
high / 1080p	9−10	50−55
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 415% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	55−60
high / 768p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro W4100.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4100	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Architecture	GCN	Turing
Code name	Cape Verde	TU117
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2015	no data
Pipelines	512	1024
Core clock speed	630 MHz	1530 MHz
Boost Clock		1725 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Texture fill rate	20.16
Floating-point performance	645.1 gflops
Length	171 mm	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	79 Mh/s
Form factor	low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support	+
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price

FirePro W4100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares