FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 807 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 94% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 96% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 74% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 118% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 103% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Turing |
| Code name | Tonga | TU117 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | no data |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |