GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 755 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 786% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Turing |
| Code name | GF117 | TU117 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | no data |
| Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |