GeForce 920M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
When choosing between GeForce 920M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 576 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce 920M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 786% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | N16V-GM-S | TU117 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 January 2015 | no data |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |