GeForce 940A vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 940A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 940A and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 940A
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Main Specs
| GeForce 940A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 127% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 501 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 5998 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 609% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 940A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 642% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 400% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 608% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 352% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 462% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 777% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940A | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
| Code name | GM108 | TU117 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | no data |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |