GeForce 940M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 940M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 940M stacks up against GeForce GTX 1650 Ti, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce 940M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 940M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce 940M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 940M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- GeForce 940M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 458 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
- GeForce 940M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 6000 MHz higher, than GeForce 940M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 780% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 825% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 940M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 940M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 130% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 920% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 487% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 666% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 326% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 41% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 800% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 14−16 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 857% more, than GeForce 940M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GeForce 940M. |
Full Specs
GeForce 940M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | N16S-GT-S/B | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1072 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 28.22 | |
Floating-point performance | 903.2 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 101 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |